I recently read the book, “Finnish Lessons – What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? By Pasi Sahlberg (Foreword by Andy Hargreaves). Here are some observations and ideas to ponder.
Comparing Finland to Canada
1. Less is More: Finnish Teachers spend less time teaching than Canadian counterparts. Approximately 4 lessons per day (about 4 hours of teaching), which provides more time for Professional Development, collaboration, assessment and personalization of instruction
2. Finnish Teachers have more control in developing and implementing curriculum.
3. Less standardized testing seems to promote increased levels of creativity, innovation and critical thinking
Core Beliefs: Teachers and Schools
1. Collaboration vs Competition – Teachers, schools and communities are encouraged to network, work together and to collaborate. There are “friendly rivalries” that exist between communities, but in general, the prevailing culture values “equity of opportunity & access”.
2. Teachers are encouraged to be leaders and take responsibility for the whole child.
3. Bureaucracy of decision-making is simplified. Risk-taking is encouraged and mistakes are expected as a vehicle for learning.
Students Learn Differently: Individualized Learning and Assessment
1. Students are provided with increasing levels of choice in their learning as they progress.
2. Students are able to cobble together their own learning paths from a menu of modular-designed courses. This also allows for students to progress at their own pace (some requiring additional time, others not as much).
3. Students can choose between two primary “streams” of education once their primary years are completed; however, they still have opportunities to move between the “streams” should their goals change
The Education System
Finland’s current education system benefits from a long cultural and political history that promotes equity for all, pragmatism, trust in public institutions and a general belief that “everyone” needs to be included.
Educational policy is interwoven with other public policies – i.e. welfare, paid for university, pre-school, etc. They have geared their society to support families and individuals to “be all that they can be” in order to better support a knowledge-based work force which in turn helps to support the social safety net for all.
The Philosophy: Moving to the Future
- Development of a personal road map for learning. It is important for each young person to acquire certain basic knowledge, such as reading, writing, and using mathematics. In the future, it will be important that students have alternative ways to learn these basic things. Children will learn more and more of what we used to learning school out of school, through media, the Internet, and from difference social networks to which they belong. This will lead to a situation in which an increasing number of students will find teaching in school irrelevant because they have already learned what is meaningful for them elsewhere.
2. Less classroom-based teaching. Rather than continue thinking of future schooling in terms of subjects and time allocations to them, the time is right now to make a bold move and rethink the organization of time in schools.
3. Development of interpersonal skills and problem solving. In the future people will spend more time on and give more personal attention to media and communication technologies than they do today. It means two things from the educational point of view. First, people in general will spend less time together in a concrete social setting. Social interaction will be based on using social networking and other future tools that rely on digital technological solutions. Second, people will learn more about the world and other people through media and communication technologies. Schools need to rethink what their core task in educating people will be. What most people in the future will need that they are not likely to learn anywhere else is real problem-solving in cooperation with other people. This will become one of the basic functions of future schools: to teach cooperation and problem solving in small groups of diverse people.
4. Engagement and creativity as pointers of success. People will learn more of what they need through digital tools and media, and therefore it will become increasingly difficult to know what role schools have played in students’ learning (or not learning if you wish) of intended things. First, engaging all students in learning in school will be more important than ever. Second, students’ ability to create something valuable and new in school will be more important than ever – not just for some students, but for most of them. In other words, a successful school is able to take each individual – both students and teachers – further in their development than they could have gone by themselves.
Global Trends vs. The Finnish Way
Teaching core subjects Broad and creative learning
Standardization Personalization
Test-based accountability Professional responsibility
Market-based management Educational leadership
Data and control Collaboration and trust
The Canadian and Finnish cultures are very different but they do share at least one educational belief: For students to be successful we need to work collaboratively and always in the best interest of the child. I encourage you to take the time to read this fascinating expose of the Finnish educational system. Mb